![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Things You
Think About Improv That Are Wrong by Jeff Catanese, Improv Review
Although any improvisor
will tell you that their work is nothing to be laughed at, much of what calls
itself improv in the world today is in fact being performed in comedy clubs for
the sake of laughs. However, that is
representative of only a portion of what is happening in the improv world. So many theater companies, mime and Commedia dell’Arte troupes and even comedic troupes are using the
tenets of improv to explore the more dramatic, experimental and fantastic
elements that theater comprises, and happily calling it legitimate theater.
When you try to imagine what Og and Gorp
performed in the first theater piece ever, you have to include
improvisation. Born of storytelling, all
theater began simply as a method to effectively convey ideas. And even before the Greeks formalized what we
now know of theater, people were using improvisation to tell simple stories,
communicate abstract ideas and even teach each other. The Greeks were wont to change the plays as
they were being performed, Medieval Mystery plays had a greatly improvised content,
and Commedia dell’Arte was almost wholly improvised
around a simple scenario. That was all
before the 15th century.
Improvisation has as rich and lengthy a history as any other art form.
Stanislavsky used improv as a tool in his work. He invented a method of acting (commonly call
“the method” or method acting”) in the early part of the twentieth century that
included improvisation to find emotion or the motivation of a character in a
particular scene. The followers of this
method formulated these improvisations into a series of “games” for the actors
to play in order create a standardized way of teaching the method. The most famous of these is Viola Spolin’s book Improvisation for the Theater. In classrooms and individual study, it didn’t
take long for the students to realize that the “games” they were playing became
wonderful scenes in and of themselves, and were often
quite hilarious. It would seem that a
few of these students in the 1950’s and ‘60s thought it might be fun to perform
them onstage and invite an audience. The
rest is history.
The same can be said of most writers,
painters, sculptors, singers, and latch-hook rug makers. The truth is that improvisors
come in all shapes and sizes. Although
improvisation is popular enough to be performed almost everywhere in the world,
there are still very few venues to legitimize the passionate play of improvisors with a big, fat paycheck at the end of each
week. Outside of the major theatrical
centers of the world (
Many people have the idea that to improvise
you have to get up on a stage and “make it up.” While it’s true that
that’s the bulk of it, it could also be said that the bulk of driving is
pointing the car, so let’s allow five-year-olds to do it. Bad idea. To master the art of improv can take many
years, and a great understanding, not just of improv’s
tenets, but those of many different disciplines. Because there are fewer
parameters than any other performing art, one must be prepared for anything
that comes your way. That includes forays into the worlds of writing,
directing, design, dance, music, singing, mime, stage combat, and especially
acting. Once you’ve got all of these down, then you can say that improv
is easy.
Very often when even the most seasoned
actors are told that they have to do some improv, either as preparation for a
role or in a classroom, their teeth clench and a lump forms in their
throats. They are deathly afraid of
improv. The most common reason being,
“I’m just not funny.” Whereas that is
believed to be the most important element to improv, it is not. (See Myth #1)
Most of us are raised to be improvisors. Every day one improvises conversations,
decides which fork in the road to take, and even solves problems. The idea is not to do something strange and
difficult on stage, but to translate those natural improv abilities into a
performance piece. In learning the basic
tenets of improv (“Yes, and…,” commitment, acceptance, etc.) one can make that
leap and see that, in fact, all they have to do is get on stage and make it
up.*
It already has. As a means to an end improv has influenced
every art form you can buy a ticket to.
As an end unto itself improv has shown up in the films of Mike Leigh and
Robert Altman, on television as Whose Line Is It Anyway? and even The Ernie Kovacs Show in the fifties. Much of today’s theater is designed to be
interactive, and many other performance pieces contain improvisational
segments. As one looks to the future of
entertainment, one can’t help but imagine that improvisation will soon be the
way to blend the performer with the audience, and allow everyone to be part of
the art. *A contradiction? Yes.
Isn’t art wonderful? |
phone: 626.200.6993 - email: contact@paulbellos.com |